Interview with Rand Fishkin about logoIt’s an absolute pleasure to have been given the opportunity to interview Rand Fishkin of SEOmoz fame (@randfish), about his new side-project: is a joint collaboration between Rand and Dharmesh Shah of HubSpot (@dharmesh), which has been going since February – so about 4 months now. Although Rand has already been interviewed about over at Mixergy (around the time the site was launched), I wanted to catch up with Rand about how it was going 4 months in and also ask him some questions about the site, relating to technical details, UX aspects, the site’s own promotion, etc. – mainly out of curiosity as a daily user and fan of the site.

Let’s get started…

Rand Fishkin image from SEOmozSteve Morgan: is a “fun for,” not-for-profit project. What inspired its creation? What encouraged you to create a site of its type in the first place?

Rand Fishkin: Dharmesh and I had long wanted to create something like Hacker News for folks in the marketing world, and is the result of that. We both read Hacker News regularly and love the variety and value of articles submitted there.

Steve: What were the biggest challenges in creating

Rand: Finding the time to manage the product – both Dharmesh and I are insanely overwhelmed by our jobs and lives already, so this was an exercise in patience and in delegation.

Steve: I heard there was lots of downtime in the beginning. What happened? How did you handle it?

Rand: When we first launched, the Twitter signup system failed, hence folks couldn’t register, submit or vote (making the site largely useless). It was particularly sad because at launch, it got a bunch of press and visits that never returned (due to the broken-ness).

Steve: I know that @caseyhen is the main developer involved on the site. But who else is involved? I see that you have moderators as well.

Rand: We’ve got about a dozen volunteers who help with spam, submissions and moderation. Two of the most active are Dan Shure and Lauren Hall-Stigerts. The design was done by the great folks over at We Are Fixel.

Steve: How does the site’s algorithm work? Obviously there’s a voting system, with an element of time factored in (with old posts eventually drifting of the main page as they become obsolete and less popular), but is there more to it than that?

Rand: It’s very similar to the Hacker News algorithm, with a time decay factor on votes and a feature that props up items that get consistent upvotes. It’s not tremendously complicated, but we have tweaked it a few times to get to something that feels appropriate.

Steve: Do you find that the algo constantly needs tweaking and tinkering? How’s that going?

Rand: In the first month after launch, I think we changed it 4-5 times, but since finding a sweet spot, it’s been fairly solid.

Steve: Posts can only be upvoted, and not downvoted as well. Was this implemented on purpose?

Rand: Yes. We didn’t want folks burying stuff they didn’t like. There’s been more than a few articles on the site that I’d have voted down, but removing that makes the overall experience far more positive.

Steve: It’s interesting you say that, because over on SEOmoz, users can downvote posts and comments as well, which is why I was curious.

Rand: I think if we were starting the Moz blogging system anew, we’d probably go with the thumbs-up only. It’ll likely stay due to legacy, but in general, my experience has been that positive votes only are the way to go.

Steve: What’s your view on self-promotion? Should people be afraid to submit their own posts (even if they are really good, ideal for the audience), or would you much rather see people only sharing other people’s content instead?

Rand: If you’re submitting 1/100 things you produce, that’s fine. If it’s closer to 1/10, that’s probably crossing a line. We don’t currently ban/remove for self-promotion or self-submissions, but we will ban accounts that consistently submit low-quality stuff (from anywhere).

Steve: How are you coping with spam? Has there been more/less than you were expecting? Have you found that the Guidelines and ”I Solemnly Swear…” button have helped at all?

Rand: There’s been less than I expected, though still more than we’d hope for. Since Twitter is the login mechanism, pure spam accounts get banned by Twitter before we need to worry about them (which is awesome). Folks are also conscientious that all their activity on the site is tied back to Twitter. I’ve tweeted at more than a few who’ve submitted spam asking them to stop or we’ll ban their account. It works like a charm. 🙂

Steve: I’ve actually contacted Casey a couple of times pointing out spam submission spam and comment spam. Have you found a lot of people doing this – trying to help police the site and reporting those who are causing a bad experience – even though they’re not official moderators?

Rand: Yeah, we’ve had a few good Samaritans like yourself helping out, which is awesome. Thank you!

Steve: Any funny/odd spam submissions you’ve received that you’d be happy to share?

Rand: Sadly, nothing particularly fun. A few e-commerce retailers from Turkey, but that’s about the only memorable one. Spam’s getting pretty boring these days. Honestly, if something truly fun came through, we’d probably keep it on the site, just for kicks. 🙂

Steve: I’ve noticed on your Twitter that you regularly tweet Analytics info, even recently. How’s the site fared overall?

Rand: Good, though not great. It gets solid traffic – a few thousand visits a day, lots of new folks checking it out, but overall the traffic has been growing very mildly since launch. I think we’re ~50K visits/month. The best part of the site for now is that it can expose many prominent influencers in the marketing world to great content/sites/tools they otherwise wouldn’t have found.

Steve: It’s a shame that you say “good, though not great.” Do you have any plans to push it more in the future via any PR/marketing efforts? Or are you happy to see how it goes?

Rand: We’ll probably let it continue to grow organically for the next few months, but may do something to promote/boost externally thereafter.

Steve: How many submissions do you receive nowadays, roughly?

Rand: We’ve had 10,649 submissions in 133 days, so ~80/day.

Steve: Do you have any plans to make changes to the site in the near future? If so, what should we expect to see?

Rand: No big ones right now. We’re hoping to grow engagement in submissions, voting and comments, but given it’s a side project, it’s tough to devote a lot of resources right now. Thankfully, a great community of folks are helping out.

Steve: Overall, what have you learnt from creating and launching

Rand: People in the marketing world are generally awesome, rarely buttholes and love discovering useful content. I’d also say that personally, I wondered whether something like this could organically sustain and grow without much engagement from Dharmesh and I. The answer is yes, at least a little, but clearly we could/should be doing more.

Steve: Lastly, what’s your advice to someone hoping to do something similar, perhaps a community-curated news site in their particular niche or industry? Do you think it works better with inbound marketing than it would with other industries/niches? If so, why is that?

Rand: It definitely helps to have a community that’s comfortable and familiar with portals like these (and with interacting socially on the web). I think it also helped tremendously to have the boosts from many already-existing communities and individuals (like SEOmoz/Hubspot and Rand/Dharmesh). Without that, it would have been tough to get off the ground.

And that’s it! Once again, I’d like to say a massive thank you to Rand for answering my questions!


  • […] Interview with Rand Fishkin about 1 Upvotes Discuss Flag Submitted 1 min ago Andrew Isidoro Community Comments […]

  • Andrew Isidoro

    June 26, 2012 at 7:59 am Reply

    Nice one Steve. Another cracker.

    I’m a huge fan of and it’s where I spend the first 10-20min of my day to find some great new info. Though it does seem to be a bit of a club with many SEO’s voting in packs.

    I usually just checkout the first page then head on over to the incoming page.

    Anywho…always great to hear more from the inside the mind of Rand 🙂

    • Steve

      June 26, 2012 at 4:47 pm Reply

      Thanks Andrew. 🙂

  • Iain

    June 26, 2012 at 4:19 pm Reply

    I hadn’t realised self-submission was frowned on. I have submitted 4 or 5 of my own/my employer’s blogs but will now no longer do so.

    Feeling rather sheepish.

    • Steve

      June 26, 2012 at 4:49 pm Reply

      Hehe – I had exactly the same realisation, Iain!

      I wouldn’t worry too much I guess, so long as it’s not a) too much, b) too frequent, or c) too spammy. As Rand says, he doesn’t mind the very, very occasional post.

  • Gaz copeland

    June 26, 2012 at 5:22 pm Reply

    Interesting how Rand thinks the whole project is going, personally I find the site really useful both as a reader and a Blogger, it sends a nice bit of traffic over if you get the top spot.

    Great interview, thanks.

  • Geoff

    June 27, 2012 at 12:38 am Reply

    Congrats on getting an interview with the big fish, Steve! 🙂

  • Tom Andrews

    July 29, 2012 at 6:09 pm Reply

    Great resource, it’s so useful to have so many opinions in one place + source of some of most refreshing posts I have read so far 🙂

  • […] I interviewed Rand Fishkin about – the community-curated inbound marketing resource – earlier this […]

  • […] Around this time last year, I interviewed Rand Fishkin (@randfish) – CEO/founder of Moz – about (which you can read here). […]

  • […] interview-style posts, whether long one-person interviews (such as my interviews with Rand Fishkin about and the Moz rebrand), or smaller/shorter contributions from a wider variety of people (such as the […]

  • […] brand that has done a lot for the SEO industry. I’ve interviewed Rand twice over on my blog (once about and another time about the rebrand from SEOmoz to Moz) and it was an absolute pleasure to do […]

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.